English compound

 ( Compound ) 

Most noun-verb compounds denoting people are of the form noun + verb + -er, where the noun is the object of the verb, for example fire-fighter. However, there are a few dozen common verb-object compounds – mostly dating from the 16th century and mostly with negative connotations – which have the opposite French order and which do not have a suffix -er. These have been labeled cutthroat compounds because 'cutthroat' is a typical example.see

As in other Germanic languages, the compounds may be arbitrarily long. However, this is obscured by the fact that the written representation of long compounds always contains spaces. Short compounds may be written in three different forms, which do not correspond to different pronunciations, though:

• The or form
  (2025). 9780226287058, The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226287058
  usually consisting of newer combinations or longer words,
  (2025). 9780192806376, Oxford University Press. . ISBN 9780192806376
  such as "distance learning", "player piano", "ice cream".
  Hemalatha Nagarajan (2022). 9781000775747, Taylor & Francis. . ISBN 9781000775747
• The form in which two or more words are connected by a hyphen. The following types of compounds are often hyphenated:
• Compounds that contain : "house-build(er)" and "single-mind(ed)(ness)",
• Adjective–adjective compounds: "blue-green",
• Verb–verb compounds: "lend-lease",
• Compounds that contain articles, prepositions or conjunctions: "rent-a-cop", "mother-of-pearl" and "hide-and-seek".
• The or form in which two usually moderately short words appear together as one. Solid compounds most likely consist of short (syllable) units that often have been established in the language for a long time. Examples are "housewife", "lawsuit", "wallpaper", "basketball".

Usage in the US and in the UK differs and often depends on the individual choice of the writer rather than on a hard-and-fast rule; therefore, spaced, hyphenated, and solid forms may be encountered for the same compound noun, such as the triplets // and / /.

In determinative compounds, however, the relationship is not attributive. For example, a footstool is not a particular type of stool that is like a foot. Rather, it is a stool for one's foot or feet. (It can be used for sitting on, but that is not its primary purpose.) In a similar manner, an office manager is the manager of an office, an armchair is a chair with arms, and a raincoat is a coat against the rain. These relationships, which are expressed by in English, would be expressed by grammatical case in other languages. (Compounds of this type are known as tatpurusha in the Sanskrit tradition.)

Both of the above types of compounds are called endocentric compounds because the semantic head is contained within the compound itself—a blackboard is a type of board, for example, and a footstool is a type of chair.

However, in another common type of compound, the exocentric (known as a bahuvrihi compound in the Sanskrit tradition), the semantic head is not explicitly expressed. A red hair, for example, is not a kind of head, but is a person with red hair. Similarly, a is also not a head, but a person with a head that is as hard and unreceptive as a block (i.e. stupid). And a lionheart is not a type of heart, but a person with a heart like a lion (in its bravery, courage, fearlessness, etc.).

There is a general way to tell the two apart. In a compound "X":

• Can one substitute Y with a noun that is a Y, or a verb that does Y? This is an endocentric compound.
• Can one substitute Y with a noun that is with Y? This is an exocentric compound.

Exocentric compounds occur more often in adjectives than nouns. A V-8 car is a car with a V-8 engine rather than a car that is a V-8, and a twenty-five-dollar car is a car with a worth of Dollar sign25, not a car that is $25. The compounds shown here are bare, but more commonly, a morpheme is added, such as -ed: a two-legged person is a person with two legs, and this is exocentric.

On the other hand, endocentric adjectives are also frequently formed, using the suffixal morphemes -ing or -er/or. A people-carrier is a clear endocentric determinative compound: it is a thing that is a carrier of people. The related adjective, car-carrying, is also endocentric: it refers to an object which is a carrying-thing (or equivalently, which does carry).

These types account for most compound nouns, but there are other, rarer types as well. Coordinative, copulative or dvandva compounds combine elements with a similar meaning, and the compound meaning may be a generalization instead of a specialization. Bosnia-Herzegovina, for example, is the combined area of Bosnia and Herzegovina, but a fighter-bomber is an aircraft that is both a fighter and a bomber. Iterative or amredita compounds repeat a single element, to express repetition or as an emphasis. Day by day and go-go are examples of this type of compound, which has more than one head.

Analyzability may be further limited by cranberry morphemes and semantic changes. For instance, the word butterfly, commonly thought to be a metathesis for flutter by, which the bugs do, is actually based on an old wives' tale that butterflies are small that steal butter from . Cranberry is a part translation from Low German, which is why we cannot recognize the element cran (from the Low German kraan or kroon, "crane"). The ladybird or ladybug was named after the Christian expression "our Lady, the Virgin Mary".

In the case of verb+noun compounds, the noun may be either the subject or the object of the verb. In playboy, for example, the noun is the subject of the verb ( the boy plays), whereas it is the object in callgirl ( someone calls the girl).

A compound modifier is a sequence of modifiers of a noun that function as a single unit. It consists of two or more words (adjectives, gerunds, or nouns) of which the left-hand component modifies the right-hand one, as in "the dark-green dress": dark modifies the green that modifies dress.

However, in British usage, these, apart from downtown, are more likely written with a hyphen: ear-splitting, eye-catching.

Other solid compound modifiers are for example:

• Numbers that are spelled out and have the Affix -fold added: "fifteenfold", "sixfold".
• Points of the compass: northwest, northwestern, northwesterly, northwestwards. In British usage, the hyphenated and open versions are more common: north-western, north-westerly, north west, north-westwards.

Generally, a compound modifier is hyphenated if the hyphen helps the reader differentiate a compound modifier from two adjacent modifiers that modify the noun independently. Compare the following examples:

• "small appliance industry": a small industry producing appliances
• "small-appliance industry": an industry producing small appliances

The hyphen is unneeded when capitalization or italicization makes grouping clear:

• "old English scholar": an old person who is English and a scholar, or an old scholar who studies English
• "Old English scholar": a scholar of Old English.
• " De facto proceedings" (not " de-facto")

If, however, there is no risk of ambiguities, it may be written without a hyphen: Sunday morning walk (a "walk on Sunday morning" is practically the same as a "morning walk on Sunday").

Hyphenated compound modifiers may have been formed originally by an adjective preceding a noun, when this phrase in turn precedes another noun:

• "Round table" → "round-table discussion"
• "Blue sky" → "blue-sky law"
• "Red light" → "red-light district"
• "Four wheels" → "four-wheel drive" (historically, the singular or root is used, not the plural)

Others may have originated with a verb preceding an adjective or adverb:

• "Feel good" → "feel-good factor"
• "Buy now, pay later" → "buy-now pay-later purchase"

Yet others are created with an original verb preceding a preposition.

• "Stick on" → "stick-on label"
• "Walk on" → "walk-on part"
• "Stand by" → "stand-by fare"
• "Roll on, roll off" → "roll-on roll-off ferry"

The following compound modifiers are always hyphenated when they are not written as one word:

• An adjective preceding a noun to which - d or - ed has been added as a past participle construction, used before a noun:
• "loud-mouthed hooligan"
• " lady"
• "rose-tinted glasses"
• A noun, adjective, or adverb preceding a present participle:
• "an awe-inspiring personality"
• "a long-lasting affair"
• "a far-reaching decision"
• Numbers, whether or not spelled out, that precede a noun:
• "seven-year itch"
• "five-sided polygon"
• "20th-century poem"
• "30-piece band"
• "tenth-storey window"
• "a 20-year-old man" (as a compound modifier) and "the 20-year-old" (as a compound noun)—but "a man, who is 20 years old"
• A numeral with the affix -fold has a hyphen ( 15-fold), but when spelled out takes a solid construction ( fifteenfold).
• Numbers, spelled out or not, with added -odd: sixteen-odd, 70-odd.
• Compound modifiers with high- or low-: "high-level discussion", "low-price markup".
• Colours in compounds:
• "a dark-blue sweater"
• "a reddish-orange dress".
• Fractions as modifiers are hyphenated: "two-thirds majority", but if numerator or denominator are already hyphenated, the fraction itself does not take a hyphen: "a thirty-three thousandth part". (Fractions used as nouns have no hyphens: "I ate two thirds of the pie.")
• Comparatives and superlatives in compound adjectives also take hyphens:
• "the highest-placed competitor"
• "a shorter-term loan"
• However, a construction with most is not hyphenated:
• "the most respected member".
• Compounds including two geographical modifiers:

* "Anglo-Indian"

But not

* "", which refers to people from a specific geographical region

* "African American", as a hyphen is seen to disparage minority populations as a hyphenated ethnicity

The following compound modifiers are not normally hyphenated:

• Compound modifiers that are not hyphenated in the relevant dictionary or that are unambiguous without a hyphen.
• Where there is no risk of ambiguity:
• "a Sunday morning walk"
• Left-hand components of a compound modifier that end in -ly and that modify right-hand components that are past participles (ending in - ed):
• "a hotly disputed subject"
• "a greatly improved scheme"
• "a distantly related celebrity"
• Compound modifiers that include and with more, most, less or least:
• "a more recent development"
• "the most respected member"
• "a less opportune moment"
• "the least expected event"
• Ordinarily hyphenated compounds with intensive adverbs in front of adjectives:
• "very much admired classicist"
• "really well accepted proposal"

• The third- and fourth-grade teachers met with the parents.
• Both full- and part-time employees will get raises this year.
• We don't see many 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children around here.

A compound verb is usually composed of an adverb and a verb, although other combinations also exist. The term compound verb was first used in publication in Grattan and Gurrey's Our Living Language (1925).

Some compound verbs are difficult to analyze morphologically because several derivations are plausible. Blacklist, for instance, might be analyzed as an adjective+verb compound, or as an adjective+noun compound that becomes a verb through zero derivation. Most compound verbs originally have the collective meaning of both components, but some of them later gain additional meanings that may supersede the original, emergent sense. Therefore, sometimes the resultant meanings are seemingly barely related to the original contributors.

Compound verbs composed of a noun and verb are comparatively rare, and the noun is generally not the direct object of the verb.

Examples of compound verbs following the pattern of indirect-object+verb include " hand wash" (e.g. " you wash it by hand" ~> " you handwash it"), and " breastfeed" (e.g. " she feeds the baby with/by/from her breast" ~> " she breastfeeds the baby").

Examples of non-existent direct-object+verb compound verbs would be *" bread-bake" (e.g. " they bake bread" ~> *" they bread-bake") and *" car-drive" (e.g. " they drive a car" ~> *" they car-drive").

Note the example of a compound like " foxhunt": although this matches the direct-object+verb pattern, it is not grammatically used in a sentence as a verb, but rather as a noun (e.g. " they're hunting foxes tomorrow" ~> " they're going on a foxhunt tomorrow", but " not" *" they're foxhunting tomorrow").

• overhang (English origin)
• counterattack (Latin origin)

There was a tendency in the 18th century to use hyphens excessively, that is, to hyphenate all previously established solid compound verbs. American English, however, has diminished the use of hyphens, while British English is more conservative.

I held up my hand implies that I raised my hand.

I held up the negotiations implies that I delayed the negotiations.

I held up the bank to the highest standard implies that I demanded model behavior regarding the bank.

I held up the bank implies either (a) that I robbed the bank or (b) that I lifted upward a bank [either literally, as for a toy bank, or figuratively, as in putting a bank forward as an example of something (although usually then the sentence would end with ... as an exemplar. or similar)].

Each of the foregoing sentences implies a contextually distinguishable meaning of the word, "up," but the fourth sentence may differ syntactically, depending on whether it intends meaning (a) or (b). Specifically, the first three sentences render held up as a phrasal verb that expresses an idiomatic, figurative, or metaphorical sense that depends on the contextual meaning of the particle, "up." The fourth sentence, however, ambiguously renders up either as (a) a particle that complements "held," or as (b) an adverb that modifies "held." The ambiguity is minimized by rewording and providing more context to the sentences under discussion:

I held my hand up implies that I raised my hand.

I held the negotiations up implies that I delayed the negotiations.

I held the bank up to the highest standard implies that I expect model behavior regarding the bank.

I held the bank up upstairs implies that I robbed the upstairs bank.

I held the bank up the stairs implies that I lifted a (toy) bank along an upstairs route.

Thus, the fifth sentence renders "up" as the head word of an adverbial prepositional phrase that modifies, the verb, held. The first four sentences remain phrasal verbs.

The Oxford English Grammar () distinguishes seven types of phrasal verbs in English:

• intransitive phrasal verbs (e.g. give in)
• transitive phrasal verbs (e.g. find out discover)
• monotransitive prepositional verbs (e.g. look after ''care)
• doubly transitive prepositional verbs (e.g. blame something on someone)
• copular prepositional verbs. (e.g. serve as)
• monotransitive phrasal-prepositional verbs (e.g. look up to respect)
• doubly transitive phrasal-prepositional verbs (e.g. put something down to someone ''attribute)

English has a number of other kinds of compound verb idioms. There are compound verbs with two verbs (e.g. make do). These too can take idiomatic prepositions (e.g. get rid of). There are also idiomatic combinations of verb and adjective (e.g. come true, run amok) and verb and adverb ( make sure), verb and fixed noun (e.g. go ape); and these, too, may have fixed idiomatic prepositions (e.g. take place on).

1. "verb phrase"/"verbal phrase"—Headed by a verb, many verbal phrases are multi-word but some are one-word: a verb (which could be a compound verb).
2. "phrasal verb"—A sub-type of verb phrase, which has a Grammatical particle before or after the verb, often having a more or less idiomatic meaning.
3. "complex verb"—A type of complex phrase: In linguistics, while both "compound" and "complex" contrast with "simple", they are not synonymous ( simple involves a single element, compound involves multiple similar elements, complex involves multiple dissimilar elements).

• Metaphor
• Phrasal verb
• Portmanteau
• Syllabic abbreviations
• Morphology

• (2025). 9781405188951, Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 9781405188951
• (1987). 9780582550421, Longman Group. ISBN 9780582550421
• (2025). 9780521525633, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521525633
• (2025). 9780521833509, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521833509
• (2025). 9780748613267, Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 9780748613267
• (1994). 9780140175295, Penguin Books. ISBN 9780140175295